selas
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
selas [2019/05/28 15:47] gm_tilda |
selas [2019/06/11 17:27] (current) gm_tilda |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| * Selasi culture idealises the pursuit of knowledge, but as an end in itself rather than a means to an end. | * Selasi culture idealises the pursuit of knowledge, but as an end in itself rather than a means to an end. | ||
| * Most Selasi honour and espouse the idea of a meritocracy, but in practice their social structure is pretty far from this ideal. | * Most Selasi honour and espouse the idea of a meritocracy, but in practice their social structure is pretty far from this ideal. | ||
| - | * Selas has been embroiled in a cold war with Selas, worsened by civil unrest at home between nationalists and those who wish to unify with Eunomia again. | + | * Selasi relations with Eunomia are strained, worsened by civil unrest at home between nationalists and those who wish to unify with Eunomia again. |
| =====A history of Selas===== | =====A history of Selas===== | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| In the ensuing centuries, they expanded. They laid their values into the soil. They swore theirs would be a civilisation of thought - where anyone with ideas could set them in motion, for the betterment of all. They had [[eunomia|Eunomian]] roots, but their branches and leaves were their own; and they bore fruit. They created technology of a kind that few had seen before. Their advancements were lauded across the Seven Systems. But just as a light can be a beacon of hope, so too can it burn out. Their leadership, once hailed as a true meritocracy, became detached. They became hungry for power, wealth, and self-indulgence. Their ability to recognise great thought slowly atrophied, replaced by an ability to recognise exploitable knowledge. The people continued to output research at as remarkable a rate as ever, but their focus began to shift. Slowly. Gradually. Unnoticeably. The people let their ideas be their guides as ever, without realising that these ideas were themselves being shaped by their leaders. It was these ideas that they brought to the conference on [[the ananke conference|the Ananke]]. | In the ensuing centuries, they expanded. They laid their values into the soil. They swore theirs would be a civilisation of thought - where anyone with ideas could set them in motion, for the betterment of all. They had [[eunomia|Eunomian]] roots, but their branches and leaves were their own; and they bore fruit. They created technology of a kind that few had seen before. Their advancements were lauded across the Seven Systems. But just as a light can be a beacon of hope, so too can it burn out. Their leadership, once hailed as a true meritocracy, became detached. They became hungry for power, wealth, and self-indulgence. Their ability to recognise great thought slowly atrophied, replaced by an ability to recognise exploitable knowledge. The people continued to output research at as remarkable a rate as ever, but their focus began to shift. Slowly. Gradually. Unnoticeably. The people let their ideas be their guides as ever, without realising that these ideas were themselves being shaped by their leaders. It was these ideas that they brought to the conference on [[the ananke conference|the Ananke]]. | ||
| - | Following the explosion at the conference, the relationship between Selas and Eunomia has grown increasingly tense. Particular incidents include the revelation of Selasi research into fungal bioweapons such as those warned about at the Ananke conference,, and then, once those institutes were shut down, the discovery of chemical weapons. Although there has been no over hostility, tensions and preparation between the two planets has only grown worse over the past few years. | + | While the conference was broadly a successes, a number of diplomatic incidents increased distrust between Selas and Eunomia, a trend which only increased over the following years. Particular incidents include the revelation of Selasi research into fungal bioweapons such as those warned about at the Ananke conference,, and then, once those institutes were shut down, the discovery of chemical weapons. However, Eunomia has been caught up in dealing with domestic problems, meaning that the situation - almost by chance - has not grown worse. |
| + | This has left room for some political and social development. An underground movement, spurred by several notable articles spread in the late 1260s, has led to a growing movement of people sick of the money-focused Selasi system and calling for a return to Selas's //true// meritocratic roots. | ||
| =====Selas now===== | =====Selas now===== | ||
| - | The political situation on Selas is tense, to say the least. A significant faction of the planet is strongly in favour of reunification with Selas - some may say aggressively, given their propensity for violent tactics. However, the planet has yet to break out into a full-blown civil war, with most of the citizenry stewing in their own resentment rather than acting. | + | The political situation on Selas is tense, to say the least. A significant faction of the planet is strongly in favour of reunification with Eunomia - some may say aggressively, given their propensity for violent tactics. However, the planet has yet to break out into a full-blown civil war, with most of the citizenry stewing in their own resentment rather than acting. |
| - | However, while the situation is tense, the planet is not significantly damaged. While the risk of a true war breaking out with Eunomia is always present and there are occasional outbreaks of civil unrest, the majority of Selasi live peaceful lives, their most significant problems being the rampant inequality that permeates Selasi society. Some have argued that the Selasi leadership have taken advantage of the arms race they are currently involved in to inflate their own pockets, pouring the state treasury into a military industrial complex that serves to make the rich richer and the poor poorer -- even those who demonstrate the traditional Selasi merits. | + | However, while the situation is tense, the planet is not significantly damaged. While the risk of a true war breaking out with Eunomia is always present and there are occasional outbreaks of civil unrest, the majority of Selasi live peaceful lives, their most significant problems being the rampant inequality that permeates Selasi society. Some have argued that the Selasi leadership have taken advantage of the arms race they are currently involved in, and indeed overplayed it to inflate their own pockets, pouring the state treasury into a military industrial complex that serves to make the rich richer and the poor poorer -- even those who demonstrate the traditional Selasi merits. |
| + | These people have begun to raqlly together to call for a return to true Selasi values, and the pursuit of knowledge above all. while still a small movement for now, this move is gaining traction. | ||
| =====The people of Selas===== | =====The people of Selas===== | ||
| Line 36: | Line 38: | ||
| Members of Selasi leadership were likely to have gained their status through connections and money, rather than any inherent 'merit', and this tends to give them a different perspective. Selasi leaders are less likely to view the pursuit of knowledge without a well-defined goal in mind as worthwhile, and are more likely to favour research with obvious and obviously profitable applications. Additionally, Selasi leaders are less likely to favour the pursuit or dissemination of knowledge that has potential to negatively affect themselves or their political allies, and will often leverage their clout as leaders to suppress such research or to discredit its creator (regardless of the merits of the research itself). Despite these things, however, many Selasi leaders openly espouse a version of meritocracy which basically means that because they are in charge, their ideas and actions are by definition meritorious and 'better' than those of people who are not. | Members of Selasi leadership were likely to have gained their status through connections and money, rather than any inherent 'merit', and this tends to give them a different perspective. Selasi leaders are less likely to view the pursuit of knowledge without a well-defined goal in mind as worthwhile, and are more likely to favour research with obvious and obviously profitable applications. Additionally, Selasi leaders are less likely to favour the pursuit or dissemination of knowledge that has potential to negatively affect themselves or their political allies, and will often leverage their clout as leaders to suppress such research or to discredit its creator (regardless of the merits of the research itself). Despite these things, however, many Selasi leaders openly espouse a version of meritocracy which basically means that because they are in charge, their ideas and actions are by definition meritorious and 'better' than those of people who are not. | ||
| - | The distinction between nationalists and reunificationists is a large and bitter one: if there are moderates, they keep quiet about it. Reunificationists support full Eunomian control over Selas, while natioalists are determined to remain independent. | + | The distinction between nationalists and reunificationists is a large and bitter one: if there are moderates, they keep quiet about it. Reunificationists support full Eunomian control over Selas, while nationalists are determined to remain independent. |
selas.1559058446.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/05/28 15:47 by gm_tilda
Page Tools
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
